Migration happens with multiple transitions over the life course such as entry to education, a new job, or retirement (Preston, Heuveline, and Guillot 2000). These transitions happen more frequently at some ages and come in parallel often with migration. Adult migration usually peaks at young adult ages. Around retirement age, there is a second peak. Due to these regularities, it is possible to model migration by age, which is very important for policymakers and for demographers in estimating population dynamics. Age-specific migration models can help to estimate missing data, smooth noisy data, project trends into the future, and to generalize migration patterns across different populations.
rcbayes
has the functionality to fit and estimate
age-specific migration schedules based on the Rogers-Castro migration
model. This vignette briefly introduces the Rogers-Castro model and then
gives examples of both calculating age-specific migration curves given a
set of parameters, and fitting the Rogers-Castro model given a set of
age-specific migration rates.
Rogers and Castro (1981) developed a mathematical model of migration with up to 13 parameters. Seven of these parameters explain the shape of migration by age, while the rest of parameters represent the intensity of migration. The original formula for the migration rate at age x is:
The c parameter describes the baseline level of migration. There are four other distinct parts to the equation, which each describe the shape and intensity of migration at different ages:
For each of the components, the ak terms describe the heights of the peaks of migration rates. The αk and λk parameters describe the shape of each of the components, in terms of the rate of change over age. And μ2 and μ3 give the ages at the labour force peak and at the retirement peak, respectively.
The migration model need not have all the ‘families’ of migration at different age stages. In practice, there are four combinations of families that are the most common (Rogers, Little, and Raymer 2010):
The functions in rcbayes
allow for any combination of
the components to be included in the model.
rcbayes
rcbayes
includes two migration model-related functions:
mig_calculate_rc
, which returns age-specific migration
rates calculated based on an age range and set of parameter inputs, and
mig_estimate_rc
, which estimates parameter values and
age-specific migration rates m(x) based on an observed
age range and migration rates. This section gives examples of both
functions.
We can calculate the implied age-specific rates from a set of
parameter inputs. Parameters are defined the same way as in the equation
above, that is, c
is the overall intensity, the
a
’s are the intensities at each age family, the
alpha
s and lambda
s are the rate of decrease
and increase of the shape at each age family, and the mu
s
are the age of peak migration for working age and retirement.
The following is an example specifying values for each of the 13 possible parameters, with values calculated for each age up to age 100:
library(rcbayes)
library(tibble)
library(ggplot2)
pars <- c(a1= 0.09, alpha1= 0.1,
a2= 0.2, alpha2= 0.1, mu2= 21, lambda2= 0.4,
a3= 0.02, alpha3= 0.25, mu3= 67, lambda3= 0.6,
a4= 0.01, lambda4= 0.01,
c= 0.01)
ages <- 0:100
mx <- mig_calculate_rc(ages = ages, pars = pars)
# plot to see what the schedule looks like
df <- tibble(age = ages, mx = mx)
df %>%
ggplot(aes(age, mx)) +
geom_line() +
ggtitle("Rogers-Castro age-specific migration schedule (13-parameter)")
Not all parameters need to be specified. The following shows an example of the 9 parameter specification:
pars <- c(a1= 0.09, alpha1= 0.1,
a2= 0.2, alpha2= 0.05, mu2= 25, lambda2= 0.4,
c= 0.01)
ages <- 0:100
mx <- mig_calculate_rc(ages = ages, pars = pars)
# plot to see what the schedule looks like
df <- tibble(age = ages, mx = mx)
df %>%
ggplot(aes(age, mx)) +
geom_line() +
ggtitle("Rogers-Castro age-specific migration schedule (9-parameter)")
Note, however, that all parameters within a particular component family must be specified. So for example, if one of the working-age family parameters is specified (Group 2), then all must be specified, otherwise an error occurs.
The mig_estimate_rc
function returns estimated
Rogers-Castro parameters and m(x) values, based on
observed age-specific migration data and the Rogers-Castro components to
be included in the model. The function has the capability of estimating
a Rogers-Castro age schedule with any combination of the components
pre_working_age
, working_age
,
retirement
and post_retirement
. These are
specified as logicals (either TRUE
or FALSE
)
in the function.
As illustrated above, Rogers-Castro migration age schedules are
highly non-linear, as so are not necessarily straight forward to
estimate. Previous approaches have used, for example, Excel’s Solver
function or the optim
function in R
.1 However,
the estimated parameters and schedules are highly sensitive to the
initial values chosen for the parameter values, and convergence is
difficult to achieve for the 11 and 13 parameter models.
In rcbayes
, we estimate Rogers-Castro schedules in a
Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm,
via the Stan programming language (Carpenter et
al. 2017). The use of Bayesian methods allows for priors to be
set on parameters, which helps convergence in the estimation
process.
mig_estimate_rc
The following arguments are required for the
mig_estimate_rc
function:
ages
, pre_working_age
,
working_age
, retirement
and
post_retirement
migrants
and pop
to provide data on the
number of age-specific migrants and age-specific population ORmx
to provide data on age-specific migration ratesThat is, users have an option to input their data as counts or as
rates. Depending on which one is used, a different model will be run. If
the user provides data as counts using migrants
and
pop
, a Poisson model will be applied. If the user provides
data as rates, a Normal model will be applied.
When running mig_estimate_rc
, a message will appear
informing the user of which model is run.
mig_estimate_rc
In the case that the Normal model is used (i.e., the user inputs
age-specific migration rates using the argument mx
), the
user can use the optional argument sigma
to input the
standard deviation for the normal model. If this optional input is not
used, the value of sigma
is estimated.
Regardless of which model is used, any additional arguments for
mig_estimate_rc
will be additional inputs to
rstan::stan()
.
In this example, we will fit an 11-parameter model to a set of observed age-specific rates from a population that resembles 1% of the Florida population in the United States. First, we can plot the observed rates to get a sense of what the age schedule looks like
fl_ages <- 0:80
fl_migrants <- c(49, 48, 48, 52, 50, 45, 42, 46, 45, 44, 47, 55, 57, 59, 67, 69, 71, 78, 93, 88, 116,
106, 102, 104, 102, 123, 112, 102, 112, 105, 100, 83, 81, 77, 78, 77, 66, 64, 65, 64,
68, 52, 59, 51, 54, 55, 52, 58, 64, 53, 68, 53, 57, 67, 71, 78, 75, 77, 77, 83, 88,
80, 84, 79, 77, 83, 71, 59, 65, 67, 64, 63, 56, 50, 43, 46, 46, 38, 32, 28, 29)
fl_pop <- c(2028, 2193, 2271, 2370, 2403, 2160, 2109, 2206, 2456, 2334, 2392, 2534, 2542, 2601, 2526,
2416, 2420, 2344, 2606, 2355, 2867, 2589, 2426, 2390, 2377, 2909, 2753, 2633, 2847, 2819,
2979, 2608, 2708, 2602, 2745, 2883, 2624, 2607, 2677, 2637, 2964, 2414, 2481, 2464, 2510,
2695, 2552, 2711, 2794, 2683, 2888, 2439, 2631, 2814, 2854, 2999, 2959, 2852, 2957, 2985,
2970, 2882, 2839, 2737, 2782, 2799, 2710, 2527, 2512, 2530, 2505, 2521, 2551, 2125, 1838,
2057, 2037, 1804, 1542, 1470, 1452)
df <- tibble(age = fl_ages, mx = fl_migrants / fl_pop)
df %>%
ggplot(aes(age, mx)) +
geom_point() +
ggtitle("Observed migration rates")
Let’s fit a Rogers-Castro migration age schedule to these data. Below, we choose to estimate parameters associated with the pre-working age, working and retirement components (but not post retirement). We also provide the data as counts, which means that we are fitting a Poisson model.
rc_res <- mig_estimate_rc(
ages=fl_ages, migrants=fl_migrants, pop=fl_pop,
pre_working_age = TRUE,
working_age = TRUE,
retirement = TRUE,
post_retirement = FALSE,
# (optional) arguments for Stan
chains = 4,
iter = 2000,
control = list(adapt_delta = 0.8, max_treedepth = 10)
)
The mig_estimate_rc
function also allows for addition
arguments that are related to the Stan model. In the example above, the
values listed for chains
, iter
,
adapt_delta
and max_treedepth
are the default
values, so need have not been specified. However, depending on the
context, it may make sense to increase the value of each of these
components to ensure convergence. More details about these arguments can
be found in the R
help files for rstan::stan
,
and also by referring to the Stan
documentation.
As mentioned above, this example’s data is in the form of count data.
In the case that your data is in the form of migration rates, swap out
the migrants
and pop
arguments for
mx
.
When fitting models in a Bayesian framework using MCMC, as in the
case of mig_estimate_rc
, one cannot simply run the model
and use the results without further inspection. It is always necessary
to assess the model results to ensure that the model has converged. In
Bayesian models, convergence would imply that the model has converged to
a particular target distribution, which is a necessary condition before
you move on and use the model’s results.
One measure to check for convergence is to look at the potential scale reduction statistic, commonly referred to as the R-hat statistic (Gelman, Rubin, et al. 1992). Ideally, you want to see the R-hat values close to 1 as R-hat values far greater than 1 indicate that convergence has not been achieved. Generally, Gelman et al. recommend ensuring that R-hat values are below 1.1, although there is no universally agreed upon threshold (Gelman et al. 2013). More information about R-hat values is available in the Stan documentation.
In addition to convergence, another difficulty around MCMC algorithms is that the samples may be autocorrelated within a chain. One way to measure this is to look at the effective sample size (Neff), which tells us the estimation power of your dependent MCMC samples in terms of hypothetical independent samples. A low effective sample size increases the uncertainty of estimates for posterior means, variances, etc (Geyer 2011). If your effective sample size is small, you should consider increasing the number of MCMC samples. More information about the effective sample size is available in the Stan documentation.
The check_converge
object in the function output allows
you to check the R-hat values and effective sample size.
rc_res[['check_converge']]
#> mean se_mean n_eff Rhat
#> alpha1[1] 0.870226739 1.064402e-02 2978.764 0.9994766
#> alpha2[1] 0.190530488 5.443403e-04 1786.985 1.0008539
#> alpha3[1] 0.205526356 1.493772e-03 1706.259 1.0010941
#> a1[1] 0.004726264 6.112932e-05 2180.687 1.0018765
#> a2[1] 0.058373658 1.179189e-04 1821.751 1.0003259
#> a3[1] 0.019992050 1.049587e-04 1671.263 1.0028921
#> mu2[1] 24.985308597 2.063815e-02 2198.856 1.0002768
#> mu3[1] 64.849212229 1.922614e-02 2799.851 1.0007112
#> lambda2[1] 0.140144946 3.200103e-04 1860.819 1.0020920
#> lambda3[1] 0.128113472 6.631156e-04 1639.289 1.0003709
#> c 0.020058990 3.597556e-05 1002.953 1.0015354
In this example, the R-hat values are all close to 1 and effective sample sizes are sufficiently large. We can move on to interpreting the model’s results.
For more details and examples on how to deal with a non-convergent
model, please see the rcbayes
vignette Achieving Model
Convergence With mig_estimate_rc.
After ensuring that the model has converged properly, you can interpret the results of the model. There are two objects in the function’s output for this purpose.
The pars_df
object shows the median estimate and lower
and upper bound of a 95% credible interval for the Rogers-Castro
parameters. In this example, the working age peak was estimated to be at
24.9 years (95% CI: [23.1, 26.8]).
The fit_df
object shows the data and estimated median
m(x) values at each
age x, along with the lower
and upper bound of the 95% credible interval of the fits, and the
squared difference between data and the median estimate.
rc_res[['pars_df']]
#> # A tibble: 11 × 4
#> variable median lower upper
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 a1 0.00439 0.000416 0.0111
#> 2 a2 0.0585 0.0485 0.0680
#> 3 a3 0.0200 0.0116 0.0288
#> 4 alpha1 0.752 0.0676 2.26
#> 5 alpha2 0.190 0.148 0.238
#> 6 alpha3 0.196 0.113 0.353
#> 7 c 0.0202 0.0172 0.0219
#> 8 lambda2 0.139 0.116 0.169
#> 9 lambda3 0.125 0.0861 0.191
#> 10 mu2 25.0 23.1 26.9
#> 11 mu3 64.8 62.9 66.8
rc_res[['fit_df']]
#> # A tibble: 81 × 6
#> ages data median lower upper diff_sq
#> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 0 0.0242 0.0245 0.0206 0.0311 0.0000000885
#> 2 1 0.0219 0.0221 0.0200 0.0251 0.0000000584
#> 3 2 0.0211 0.0212 0.0194 0.0235 0.0000000103
#> 4 3 0.0219 0.0208 0.0191 0.0227 0.00000122
#> 5 4 0.0208 0.0206 0.0189 0.0224 0.0000000306
#> 6 5 0.0208 0.0205 0.0188 0.0222 0.000000109
#> 7 6 0.0199 0.0204 0.0187 0.0220 0.000000257
#> 8 7 0.0209 0.0204 0.0186 0.0220 0.000000219
#> 9 8 0.0183 0.0204 0.0187 0.0220 0.00000430
#> 10 9 0.0189 0.0205 0.0189 0.0220 0.00000266
#> # ℹ 71 more rows
We can plot the observed data and estimated fit using the
fit_df
object:
Comments about warnings
When using
mig_estimate_rc
it is not unusual to see warnings from Stan, particularly when the retirement and post-retirement families are included in the model. These may include warnings about divergent transitions, low effective sample size and maximum treedepth. If you see these warnings, you should take special care in determining whether your model converged properly.For more in-depth examples of dealing with warnings and convergence issues, please see the
rcbayes
vignette Achieving Model Convergence With mig_estimate_rc.